Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

1864-1897
DANFS entry

User avatar
pommystuart
Posts: 1568
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 12:48 am
Location: Cooranbong, NSW, Australia.

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by pommystuart »

Found Sept 27th is Page 189 between Oct 1st and Oct 2nd.
It will show up as yantic-vol36of67_18811002_0189_21DF335A.xml

The real Oct 2nd is
yantic-vol36of67_18811002_0190_D3AF44AE

I want my pay back now! :x
:kangaroo:
User avatar
pommystuart
Posts: 1568
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 12:48 am
Location: Cooranbong, NSW, Australia.

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by pommystuart »

Any help with the letter in wx column after b at 1600?

https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorag ... 7_0191.JPG
User avatar
Michael
Posts: 4483
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 7:09 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C. Canada

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by Michael »

q for squalls. You can see his wind speed 3-5.
User avatar
Randi
Posts: 6689
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 6:53 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by Randi »

At 1500 I would guess bq. The events page does mention squalls.

Michael beat me ;)
User avatar
pommystuart
Posts: 1568
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 12:48 am
Location: Cooranbong, NSW, Australia.

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by pommystuart »

My apoligies. :oops:
It is the one above the Bq. Looks like bY
I had mq for the line below.

Forgor about my screen being one up.
This is a new scribe since landing in NY, his d looks like an s
User avatar
Randi
Posts: 6689
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 6:53 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by Randi »

I read the PM weather by symbol as:
bc
"
bq
mq
bc
"
"
"
"
"
"
"

:?:
User avatar
pommystuart
Posts: 1568
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 12:48 am
Location: Cooranbong, NSW, Australia.

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by pommystuart »

Good Evening Randi, (from a very sunny and hot Australian morning.) You can look forward to a nice Saturday.

All other q's have been closed loop which threw me with the open loop.
I don't think one letter will change the climate predictions to much so I will put q.
:kangaroo:
Last edited by pommystuart on Sat Nov 12, 2022 12:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Michael
Posts: 4483
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 7:09 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C. Canada

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by Michael »

:D :D :D
User avatar
pommystuart
Posts: 1568
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 12:48 am
Location: Cooranbong, NSW, Australia.

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by pommystuart »

More of those double number wind force like 5.8, 7.7, 7.7, 4.7
and a 2.3.4 entry on next page.
User avatar
Michael
Posts: 4483
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 7:09 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C. Canada

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by Michael »

The log keeper is just too lazy to use a -. So, 2.3 should be entered as 2-3.
User avatar
ggordon
Posts: 1255
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2020 1:14 am
Location: Near Seattle, Washington

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by ggordon »

One of the log keepers on my current Shenandoah log did the same thing, using periods instead of dashes for wind force. I transcribed them as dashes since that was clearly what was intended and I was concerned that there might be a problem processing the data if I used periods.
User avatar
Michael
Posts: 4483
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 7:09 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C. Canada

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by Michael »

Yes. 2.4 means 2-4.

CodeDescriptionRangeMean
2Light breeze4–6 knots5
3Gentle breeze7–10 knots8
4Moderate breeze11–16 knots14
So, what does 2.4 mean? Is it 4/10 of the way between 2 and 3? I don't think so.

I checked with the science team and they want 2-4 to be (5+14)/2 = 9.5 => 10. When you think that these wind speeds are just estimated, you can understand that it's like horseshoes and nukes. Close is good enough.
User avatar
pommystuart
Posts: 1568
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 12:48 am
Location: Cooranbong, NSW, Australia.

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by pommystuart »

You are all missing my point. :(
It's not the entrys with different numbers with a . between that's puzzling me, it's what something like 7.7 means. :?
See 6 and 7 am. entrys
Also 8pm 2.3.4 why not 2.4?
https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorag ... 7_0193.JPG

Whilst I am at it, any suggestions for wind dir ar 0900 on this page?
https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorag ... 7_0194.JPG
:kangaroo:
User avatar
Hanibal94
Posts: 1015
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:05 pm
Location: Leipzig, Germany

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by Hanibal94 »

pommystuart wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 2:22 am You are all missing my point. :(
It's not the entrys with different numbers with a . between that's puzzling me, it's what something like 7.7 means. :?
See 6 and 7 am. entrys
Also 8pm 2.3.4 why not 2.4?
https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorag ... 7_0193.JPG
Random guess: The wind went from 7 to 6 or 8, and then back to 7, all within one hour.
2.3.4 was a case where the wind was 3 for a significant period of time, and didn't just jump straight from 2 to 4.
pommystuart wrote: Sun Nov 13, 2022 2:22 am Whilst I am at it, any suggestions for wind dir ar 0900 on this page?
https://s3.amazonaws.com/NARAprodstorag ... 7_0194.JPG
:kangaroo:
Looks like W to me (both 9 AM and 9 PM), as it's the same shape as the first W in WSW for wind dir at 5 PM.
User avatar
Michael
Posts: 4483
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 7:09 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C. Canada

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by Michael »

I agree with Hanibal about the numbers, and probably the wind wind direction. Legibility was not your man's strong point!
User avatar
pommystuart
Posts: 1568
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 12:48 am
Location: Cooranbong, NSW, Australia.

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by pommystuart »

Thanks folks.
I can live with those answers. :)
User avatar
pommystuart
Posts: 1568
Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 12:48 am
Location: Cooranbong, NSW, Australia.

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by pommystuart »

Finished
User avatar
Michael
Posts: 4483
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 7:09 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C. Canada

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by Michael »

Good job! I'll get to it shortly. :D :D :D
User avatar
Michael
Posts: 4483
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 7:09 pm
Location: Victoria, B.C. Canada

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by Michael »

It's interesting to me to see how various places were called. On 18 February, we were in Halifax, Nova Scotia, British Province. On the 19th, we were in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. I think the use of Canada by the log keeper was just his own idea. There was no country called Canada until July 1, 1867.

Canada wasn't applied to Nova Scotia until Confederation. Nova Scotia was part of the French Colony of Acadia. It was also called Annapolis Royal for a while. The British Province/colony called Canada was split in 1791 into Upper and Lower Canada, with Upper Canada referring to parts of what is now the province of Ontario. The name Ontario was given to these lands at Confederation.
Between 1534 and 1763, Quebec was called Canada and was the most developed colony in New France. Following the Seven Years' War, Quebec became a British colony: first as the Province of Quebec (1763–1791), then Lower Canada (1791–1841), and lastly Canada East (1841–1867), as a result of the Lower Canada Rebellion. It was confederated with Ontario, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick in 1867, beginning the Dominion of Canada.
User avatar
Randi
Posts: 6689
Joined: Sat Mar 14, 2020 6:53 pm
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: Yantic (1881): links, questions, comments, coordination, ...

Post by Randi »

However, you are presently in 1881, so there would be a Canada :?:
Post Reply

Return to “USS Yantic”